Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Hope's avatar

My uncle was a liberator of Dachau concentration camp.

This is a beautiful essay—deeply Catholic Christian, thoughtful, and genuinely moving.

What I admire most is that it sees the Ulma family’s holiness clearly, and names it in the right way. It does not treat them simply as tragic figures, or as historical symbols. It presents them as Christians whose love of God was made visible in costly love of neighbor.

I also think the essay is especially strong in the way it frames their martyrdom.

It recognizes that the Ulmas were not merely swept up by events. They chose to place themselves in danger for people who were being hunted, scapegoated, and abandoned. That is what gives their witness such force. The connection to the Good Samaritan is especially fitting, because it shows that their actions were not just admirable in a general sense, but were a real embodiment of the Gospel.

The section on their poverty is also very well done.

It is one thing to be generous from abundance; it is another thing entirely to be generous when you yourself have so little. The essay understands that this is part of what makes their witness so radiant. Their hospitality was not comfortable or convenient. It was sacrificial.

And the final point is especially striking. The inclusion of the unborn child in the family’s beatification is not just moving; it is theologically significant. The essay handles that with reverence and intelligence. It recognizes that this is not a small detail, but something profound—something that invites deeper reflection on sanctity, family, innocence, and grace.

What I like most overall is that the piece is both devotional and serious-minded. It is clearly written by someone who is not only moved by the Ulmas’ story, but has really thought about what their witness means. That combination gives the essay both warmth and depth.

In the end, it is a lovely tribute: faithful, perceptive, and full of quiet conviction.

Melinda Gwin's avatar

My knee-jerk thought is baptism of blood, what with them being martyrs, but were they martyred for the faith?

I think it's clear they were martyred for living out their Christian faith with integrity and grace, but nonChristians could've done the same for similar moral and ethical motives.

Is being persecuted for living your Christian faith enough for baptism of blood, or do you need to be specifically targeted for being Christian?

12 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?